If we call Clarkson racist, what word do we use for Boko Haram? – Comment – Voices – The Independent

Standard

Thus, we could say to the latest verbal offender, it is not because we’ve glimpsed the hem of your bigotries that we are incensed by you – indeed we possess identical undergarments – but because you think we love it when you tease us with the prospect of your showing more. It’s not that you’re a bit of a racist so much as that you’re a bit of a whore.

As for Clarkson, it has always seemed to me that his real crime is to be interested in cars. Not just interested in cars in the way he is, as though they are a definitive badge of masculinity, as though the idea of a man unexcited by cars is inconceivable, as though the din and roar of them must be of universal male appeal, as though driving a car up a slope – sorry, up a hill – represents the ne plus ultra of human achievement, but just interested in cars full stop.

via If we call Clarkson racist, what word do we use for Boko Haram? – Comment – Voices – The Independent.

 

The secret of Top Gear’s success: double cream

Standard

“The BBC would say, ‘You should get Professor Suchabody on talking about the environment’ and we would go, ‘F**k off, he can have the Ten O’Clock News’. Do the Two Fat Ladies say,’And if you want to have a low-fat version of this recipe you can use single cream’? They never do. They go, ‘Pile it on; heart attack now’.”

via Top Gear: why we’re mad about the boys |
Television & radio |
The Guardian
.

Food advertising v reality

Standard

I love this kind of thing. The Guardian’s Lifestyle section has a gallery of photos of convenience and fast foods as portrayed on packaging and in advertising and how they look in real life. It’s important work, and one of the better uses of the internet. I’ve seen all the German food pictures before, but the Guardian are also asking for reader-submitted photos.

Would make for a good class project, since you’ve mostly all got camera phones and eat a lot of junk food.

My best experience was in the Quick burger chain in France, where they use a cardboard tube around the burger so that it emerges from the box looking just like the photo. My favourite is the Quick’n’Toast. Quick rules.

Clarkson in the, er, manure

Standard

There is nothing not to like about this story.

A group of what Clarkson might call eco-mentalists has visited what the media call his Cotswold home and dumped a little bit of manure on his drive. Which he probably will, genuinely, love, and put on his roses.

Jeremy Clarkson targeted in manure dump protest by climate campaigners.

This is all relevant to media studies because it relates to the Lifestyle topic. In order to understand why people won’t – by themselves – do anything serious about the environment and consumption of petrochemicals you have to understand the appeal of Clarkson. There are some nice quotes, like this:

The seven campaigners, dressed as suffragettes, arrived at the automatically opening wrought iron gates of Clarkson’s Cotswold mansion outside Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, in a van fuelled by chip-fat oil.

And this:

[Clarkson’s] views on people standing up for environmental causes have offended a wide cross section of Britain. He once described ramblers as “urban communists”, cyclists as “Lycra Nazis”, and people working for transport pressure group Transport 2000 as “ugly”. Women, ethnic minorities and others have all taken offence…

His attitude to nature is also eccentric. He has questioned why Britain has so many hills, proposed that great white sharks should be eaten to extinction, been excited at the thought of Birmingham being covered by a glacier, rammed a car into a tree and driven up Ben Tongue, a Scottish mountain, in a 4×4.

Clarkson. An equal opportunities serial offender. The comments thread on the Guardian story is, as ever, is well worth a read.

Too fat to be a model? The picture that caused a storm in the fashion world

Standard

One wouldn’t have thought this would be news. As Miller says, “pretty much every picture in a magazine or ad is airbrushed . . . I don’t think the public understands how much smoke and mirrors are involved in making women look like that.”

Too fat to be a model? The picture that caused a storm in the fashion world – The Guardian.

August round-up of media stories

Standard

Here are a few stories I’ve been sitting on for a while:

  1. Mountains Out Of Molehills | Information Is Beautiful
  2. Newspaper ABCs. This is an interesting story. Although newspaper circulation figures have been steadily falling anyway, a lot of figures have been artificially inflated by means of the inclusion of “bulks”: giveaway copies you might find on planes, in car showrooms, and elsewhere. A lot of newspapers are stopping the practice, while others have been negotiating with the Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC) over, ahem, exaggerated figures. Peter Preston: Fleet Street loses out in complex numbers game

    The Mail has bailed for a better figure by adding 24,000 or so “bulk” (giveaway free copies), while the Indy has accentuated its plight by knocking 9,000 off its bulk mountain. And this is only the beginning of a complex saga as the Guardian and Observer, shedding over 20,000 bulks between them in July, declare that henceforth they will renounce bulks entirely.

    Both papers are acting forthwith. This means July’s already diminished 9,000 and 12,000 copies respectively, given away free to punters on airlines, trains and the like, will no longer form part of overall claimed sales when August’s results arrive. No padding left. If the Telegraph did likewise, its UK sale would be 669,000, a full 93,000 gone in a trice, and the Times would dip below 500,000.

  3. ITV is still the best place for mass-market advertising: Response: ITV is still the UK’s top peak-time channel

    ITV1 is the home of the top five new dramas on any channel in 2009, including Whitechapel, Above Suspicion and Unforgiven; in comedy, ITV1 again tops the charts with Harry Hill’s Bafta award-winning TV Burp and the critically acclaimed and hugely successful Benidorm; and we are rightly proud of our record-breaking entertainment hits, whether it’s Britain’s Got Talent and The X Factor, or Dancing on Ice, I'm A Celebrity … and Hell’s Kitchen.

  4. Microsoft successfully launches on-demand TV: Microsoft’s MSN Video Player nears 170,000 show views in first 11 days
  5. A university study of mobile data reveals interesting patterns of behaviour. Also, that people (as they ever did) mis-report their activities, depending on their attitudes towards them: Mobile data show friend networks
  6. Here’s one for debate: an opinion piece at newsless.org on what’s “missing” from the news. A bit US-centric, but could be relevant: The 3 key parts of news stories you usually don’t get at Newsless.org
  7. A documentary film about advertising: Art & Copy Film.
  8. It’s a fact that more equal societies are happier societies. Our very unequal society is a recipe for widespread misery – at both ends of the economic scale. Human beings are social animals and we are most fulfilled when we collaborate and share. Here’s a heartening series of articles on the GOOD blog about why we like to share:
    We Like to Share
  9. Finally, I hope it hasn’t escaped your notice that the Murdoch news empire has plans to charge for online content. Some of you know my opinion about online newspapers (I think they should keep 90% of their content for the print edition, and radically reduce the amount they publish online). What do you think about free newspapers? I never pick one up when I’m in London, and it all seems like a colossal waste of paper to me. Now the Murdochs have decided to close their London free sheet. It makes sense. If you’re going to stop giving away your content online, why continue to give it away in print? Down the drain: Why Murdoch closed the London Paper

    Given the advertising downturn, most analysts expect the London Paper’s losses over the past 12 months to have worsened. Douglas McCabe, a media analyst with Enders Media in London, says: “Murdoch is saying ‘enough is enough’. He’s saying newsrooms have value and by giving away free content you devalue them. It would be somewhat ambiguous to start charging for online news and still give away news in a free paper.”