What happens when pirates play a game development simulator and then go bankrupt because of piracy? | Greenheart GamesGreenheart Games

This is a(nother) depressing read. Game developers create a game about game development (very meta) and then release a cracked version of the game in which you cannot win because of game piracy.

The result? over 90% of those playing the (8 dollar) game play the cracked version, and then hit the forums to complain about the piracy “feature” in the game.

When we released our very first game, Game Dev Tycoon (for Mac, Windows and Linux) yesterday, we did something unusual and as far as I know unique. We released a cracked version of the game ourselves, minutes after opening our Store.

I uploaded the torrent to the number one torrent sharing site, gave it a description imitating the scene and asked a few friends to help seed it.

Read more: What happens when pirates play a game development simulator and then go bankrupt because of piracy? | Greenheart GamesGreenheart Games.

via DaringFireball

Steven Soderbergh | Film Comment | Film Society of Lincoln Center

This is a long, but always fascinating read. It’s the transcription of a speech by Steven Soderbergh, a State of Cinema address. He covers a lot of ground, and I could have pulled out any number of quotes, but I thought the one below was particularly interesting: an explanation of why the film industry doesn’t make more, cheaper movies, instead of all these blockbusters. The article starts with Soderbergh’s horror that a fellow passenger on a 5-hour plane flight was watching a number of movies on his iPad by skipping through all the dialogue and just watching the explosive action sequences.

You can read the full article, or listen to the audio of the speech, but the whole thing is worth a read. Snip:

So then there’s the expense of putting a movie out, which is a big problem. Point of entry for a mainstream, wide-release movie: $30 million. That’s where you start. Now you add another 30 for overseas. Now you’ve got to remember, the exhibitors pay half of the gross, so to make that 60 back you need to gross 120. So you don’t even know what your movie is yet, and you’re already looking at 120. That ended up being part of the reason why the Liberace movie didn’t happen at a studio. We only needed $5 million from a domestic partner, but when you add the cost of putting a movie out, now you’ve got to gross $75 million to get that 35 back, and the feeling amongst the studios was that this material was too “special” to gross $70 million. So the obstacle here isn’t just that special subject matter, but that nobody has figured out how to reduce the cost of putting a movie out. There have been some attempts to analyze it, but one of the mysteries is that this analysis doesn’t really reveal any kind of linear predictive behavior, it’s still mysterious the process whereby people decide if they’re either going to go to a movie or not go to a movie. Sometimes you don’t even know how you reach them. Like on Magic Mike for instance, the movie opened to $38 million, and the tracking said we were going to open to 19. So the tracking was 100% wrong. It’s really nice when the surprise goes in that direction, but it’s hard not to sit there and go how did we miss that? If this is our tracking, how do you miss by that much?

Read the rest: Overheard: Steven Soderbergh | Film Comment | Film Society of Lincoln Center.

via DaringFireball

“Sexism in the music industry ain’t nothing new.” Why aren’t female artists getting their due? – FACT Magazine: Music News, New Music.

Knowles is not alone in not receiving credit where credit is due. Claire Boucher, who is single-handedly reinvigorating pop music as Grimes, faces similar challenges. Despite being credited as the sole writer and producer of her three albums, Boucher has been dogged by sexism, taking to her Tumblr last week to address a variety of grievances, from press faux pas to sexual harassment. Standing out from the list was a castigation of men who dismiss her skills as a musician.

via “Sexism in the music industry ain’t nothing new.” Why aren’t female artists getting their due? – FACT Magazine: Music News, New Music..

Post Industrial Journalism: Adapting to the Present | Tow Center for Digital Journalism

Follow the link below to a must-read report by C.W. Anderson, Emily Bell and Clay Shirky on post-industrial journalism (or, in exam board terms, the impact of new media on journalism). It’s a long report, 100-pages, but it’s worth a read, or a scan, or you could just skip to the conclusion.

It’s a great resource for an “Impact of New Media” case study for the Unit 3 (MEST 3) exam.

You can download it as an electronic book or a PDF file.

Post Industrial Journalism: Adapting to the Present | Tow Center for Digital Journalism.

Free Weekends coming up for Theory Without Fear

Attention Media students about to start their Year 13 work. My gentle introduction to various media-related theories will be available on the Amazon Kindle store free of charge next weekend (26th – 28th April 2013) and the weekend after (3rd – 4th May 2013). After that, I can’t make it free again for another 90 days, so download it while you can.

You need a hardware Kindle or the (free) Kindle app on your phone, tablet, or computer.

Theory Without Fear eBook: Robert McMinn: Amazon.co.uk: Kindle Store.

News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier | Media | The Guardian

News is irrelevant. Out of the approximately 10,000 news stories you have read in the last 12 months, name one that – because you consumed it – allowed you to make a better decision about a serious matter affecting your life, your career or your business. The point is: the consumption of news is irrelevant to you. But people find it very difficult to recognise what’s relevant. It’s much easier to recognise what’s new. The relevant versus the new is the fundamental battle of the current age. Media organisations want you to believe that news offers you some sort of a competitive advantage. Many fall for that. We get anxious when we’re cut off from the flow of news. In reality, news consumption is a competitive disadvantage. The less news you consume, the bigger the advantage you have.

via News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier | Media | The Guardian.

Daily Mail – deliberately misleading readers (since 1896)

Here’s a good one from yesterday. A classic Daily Mail-ism: manufacturing outrage out of nothing in order to (a) kick the BBC and (b) keep their readers in a froth of rage so they don’t have time to think. The Mail decided to “go after” newsreaders who weren’t wearing a black tie to mourn the passing of the Witch of the East (well, Grantham). As if the wearing of a black tie when a figure of hate died was compulsory, in the same way that the wearing of a poppy is compulsory for anyone on the telly in the run-up to Remembrance Day.

So the Mail went after Huw Edwards, who was wearing a dark blue tie, and illustrated the article with a screen grab from the news – which shows Edwards wearing a pink tie. How jolly!

Putting aside the erroneous copyright attribution – it is, of course, copyright BBC – this photograph shows Huw Edwards wearing a bright pink tie… and a poppy, therefore dating this photograph to one November. (Since the background isn’t the standard background for BBC News, we can’t even work out the year.)

It turns out the screen grab dated from 2006.

Read more (and check the comments): Daily Mail – deliberately misleading readers.